Introducing the first ever AI conference assistant

Hyperion is an AI-guided submission system.

Our AI screening assistant checks submissions as they come in, gaining you days and weeks on the review stage and improving quality.

Deep knowledge of the conference subject is built in. Submission forms, review and admin are tightly integrated with a subject-specific AI. 

 

 

What authors see

As authors enter their abstracts, Hyperion analyses the text in real time and provides gentle, constructive guidance. There is no separate feedback step — comments and guidance appears alongside the abstract as they work. Clear, helpful feedback and a chance to re-submit and increase the likelihood of acceptance.

• Structural completeness — checks whether the abstract includes background, methods, results, and conclusions, and flags any gaps
• Title alignment — checks whether the title accurately reflects what the abstract is about
• Topic matching — suggests which conference topic or theme best fits the abstract, and flags cases where the fit is ambiguous
• Clarity check — identifies vague or unsupported statements that could weaken the submission
• Presentation suitability — assesses whether the abstract lends itself to an oral or poster format, helping authors understand how their work might be presented
• Written feedback — a short, encouraging summary that highlights strengths and suggests specific improvements

The tone is always supportive. Hyperion never evaluates scientific merit — it focuses on structure, clarity, and completeness so the science can speak for itself.

 

 

What reviewers see

Hyperion automatically prepares a structured summary for each reviewer. This is not a replacement for expert review — it is preparation that saves time and ensures consistency.

• Submission summary — a concise two- to three-sentence overview of what the abstract is about, so reviewers can quickly orient themselves
• Key strengths — highlights the strongest aspects of the submission based on structural and semantic analysis
• Potential concerns — flags areas that may need attention, aligned with the automated checks the author already received
• Preliminary recommendation — a starting point for the reviewer’s own assessment, not a final verdict

Reviewers still make all decisions. Hyperion simply does the groundwork so they can focus on the science rather than the paperwork.

 

 

What administrators see

Conference administrators get a higher-level operational view of each submission to see how submission is progressing, spot problems early, get help with programme planning and day-to-day management.

 

• Submission overview — a brief description of the submission for quick scanning across hundreds of entries
• Suggested presentation type — oral or poster recommendation with reasoning, to assist programme committee decisions
• Quality indicator — a simple score to help prioritise review attention where it is most needed
• Flags and notes — highlights anything unusual: atypical structure, interdisciplinary content, very short abstracts, or submissions that may need topic reassignment
• Topic verification — confirms the author’s topic selection or suggests a better fit, reducing manual reassignment work
•  

 

 

Hyperion is built for learned societies and professional organisations that run conferences with hundreds or thousands of abstract submissions. The system is configured for each conference individually. Your themes and topics, your submission types, your presentation guidelines.